<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How will Google integrate Twitter in their search results?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dizzysoft.com/web/how-will-google-integrate-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dizzysoft.com/web/how-will-google-integrate-twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gomesian</title>
		<link>http://www.dizzysoft.com/web/how-will-google-integrate-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Gomesian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Im not sure how long Twitter integrations will last, at least not in it&#039;s current state. At the moment it is far to open to manipultion and spam. Also reputation management i becomes a lot harder with Twitter results integrated. I think it was launched to remove any of the focus that was on Bing at the time and it will be removed fairly soon to be reconfigured and reapproached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im not sure how long Twitter integrations will last, at least not in it&#8217;s current state. At the moment it is far to open to manipultion and spam. Also reputation management i becomes a lot harder with Twitter results integrated. I think it was launched to remove any of the focus that was on Bing at the time and it will be removed fairly soon to be reconfigured and reapproached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.dizzysoft.com/web/how-will-google-integrate-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Dude you thefted my Michael Jackson example... if you did that search right around when he died (like that day, the next day) you would find very little about his death.  Google&#039;s indexing takes time, and thus is no good with up-to-the-minute types of stories.  Sure there are the &quot;news results&quot;, but they are insufficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they&#039;ll mainly use linkage data (and mentions) more so than content itself.  The content itself on Twitter is too little, not vetted, and too easily spammed.  They&#039;ll probably use to identify and alter time-sensitive searches towards whatever is buzzing or trending at the moment.  That&#039;s my thought anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude you thefted my Michael Jackson example&#8230; if you did that search right around when he died (like that day, the next day) you would find very little about his death.  Google&#8217;s indexing takes time, and thus is no good with up-to-the-minute types of stories.  Sure there are the &#8220;news results&#8221;, but they are insufficient.</p>
<p>I think they&#8217;ll mainly use linkage data (and mentions) more so than content itself.  The content itself on Twitter is too little, not vetted, and too easily spammed.  They&#8217;ll probably use to identify and alter time-sensitive searches towards whatever is buzzing or trending at the moment.  That&#8217;s my thought anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

